The Narcissism of the Sacred
Prelude & Chapter 1
Prelude
There are times in the life of a culture when its language begins to behave strangely.
People talk and talk. The speeches grow longer. The arguments grow intricate and beautiful.
Yet when the talking stops, nothing has moved.
It is like watching men build a chair out of air.
They measure carefully. They join one idea to another with admirable skill. They sand the edges smooth. When they are done, the chair looks complete.
Only one thing is missing.
If anyone tries to sit in it, they fall straight through.
Most people learn to stand.
In time they forget the chair was ever meant to hold weight.
Then the rulers make a small announcement. Chairs made of air, they explain, are better than chairs made of wood. Lighter. More refined. Less bound to the crude gravity of the world.
The priests arrive soon after. They give the chairs a name. They call them sacred.
The scholars follow. They develop a language for discussing the new chairs. Entire schools appear devoted to their study. Students learn to speak fluently about the idea of a chair.
The discussions grow sophisticated. The reputations grow large.
The chair remains empty.
Now and then someone appears who refuses the arrangement. Someone who insists on building with wood instead of air.
These people are rarely welcomed.
They embarrass the leaders, the builders, the priests, and the scholars.
And they remind everyone, quietly, that gravity has not changed.
Chapter 1
She knew it before she said it.
Isabel Markson stood at the front of the room, the board behind her already filled, finishing a point about what fiction does now and why it matters.
The class was quiet, the way it always was when the argument moved cleanly from one claim to the next and nothing slipped.
A novel answers to its moment. That’s why we care.
She liked how that held. It felt undeniable.
It was the last class before the break, the point in the semester when everything she'd been arguing was supposed to come together. Her course—Contemporary Fiction and the Problem of Relevance—had moved through its sequence the way she intended, each week tightening the frame she had set at the beginning.
Today she was closing it. She had set one older book—The Glass Bead Game—against the one they had just finished, a contemporary novel she admired for its control, the way it held everything in place. She could feel the argument already formed, sharper than anything she had said all term. It was something she had been turning toward for weeks. She could see it now as a paper, a timely one.
She glanced across the room, not stopping long enough to invite interruption. Jason was already leaning forward, pen in hand. Maya sat in the back, still as ever, watching. Her manner suggested she was following everything and choosing the right moment to enter it.
A week earlier, someone—she couldn’t remember who—had said, “Why do we even read novels anymore?” The implication was clear. Why did they matter?
Isabel had stumbled, recovered, moved on. It had shaken her more than she let on. Today would be her answer.
She had said goodbye to James that morning, already running through the argument in her head. “Last class,” she had told him. “I’m going to close it.” He had smiled, not looking up from his phone. “You’ll kill it. See you tonight.”
She had nodded, kissed the cat on the head, kissed him on the cheek, and left. One more seminar before the break. Then a week solo in Montevideo—a literary conference, good coffee, and a glass or two of Tannat on the balcony each night.
Her eyes settled on Jason, then drifted back to Maya in the corner. All right,” she said. “Last week someone asked why we even read novels anymore. Today let's answer it.”
She turned to the board. “We’ve been working with one assumption all term—that a novel answers to its moment.” She wrote the title. The Glass Bead Game. She capped the marker. “A book often called timeless. Today I'd like us to interrogate that claim."
She set the marker down and sat on the edge of the desk, letting the room settle again. She wore dark pants and a loose blouse, sleeves pushed back without thinking. Her hair was pulled up, not carefully, but in a way that held. She brushed at a stray cat hair on her thigh, more out of habit than concern. One foot rested lightly against the leg of the desk, the other on the floor, her posture open, unselfconscious. The room was hers.
“I would suggest that what we’re calling timeless is really just a function of its moment. These books made sense within the conditions that produced them. They were timely in a way that felt complete…for their time.
"The question is what happens when the conditions that produced that moment are no longer ours."
She surveyed the room. So far, so good.
“Take Hesse,” she said. “He’s writing in the middle of a Europe coming apart, and he builds a closed system—self-contained, sealed off from that collapse.
“It feels unplaceable in time. You could set it a hundred years in the past or a hundred years ahead and nothing essential would change.”
She looked up. A few of them were already writing, heads down, taking it in word for word. In the second row, Arlen hadn’t written anything. He was watching her, eyes fixed, not hostile, not disengaged. Waiting for something to land. His pen lay untouched. He glanced toward the window, then back at her.
“Let’s look at Hesse more closely.”
She sat on the edge of the desk. “He’s writing as fascism takes hold in Germany, and what he gives us in Castalia is a perfect intellectual game—ordered, complete, self-contained—while the world outside that made it possible is collapsing.”
She waited.
“It’s an allegory. A critique of an intellectual class absorbed in its own refinement while the country around it burns. The Game preserves coherence, mastery, form, but only by refusing the chao that lies outside it.”
She waited.
“Knecht is the master of that system. He rises through it. He embodies it. He walks away from the Game because he rejects what it requires. Safety. Irrelevance. He chooses the imperfect world itself, the one Castalia was built to exclude.”
She watched them, the pens flailing. The same boy, Arlen, glared at her.
“The novel is exact for its time. It shows you a perfect intellectual order and then the moment it collapses against reality.”
She forced a smile, realizing the point wasn't quite landing.
“In other words,” she said, “Knecht says, I’m out of here. Screw this. I’m getting my hands dirty. I'm going back to the world."
Her eyes moved once across the room. She returned to the board, underlining The Glass Bead Game with two sharp swipes of the red marker. She turned around, feeling more confident than when she began.
“That isn’t timelessness. That’s precision. It’s cut to fit a moment.”
She met their eyes. Most of them were attuned to their pens and notes. A few were just listening, watching.
“So when we call these older classics timeless, what we’re really responding to is how completely they answer the conditions they come out of. They resolve something within those conditions.”
Her posture changed, almost imperceptible.
“In my view, the classics are closer to an artifact than we like to admit. Important, exact, necessary for their time. But still of that time.”
She hesitated. Something in her gut tightened. She caught Arlen's eyes, then turned back to the board and wrote the title without comment. The Shape of Shadows.
“This novel follows a single consciousness very closely. A blind woman moving through a world she can’t fully access, where most of what matters remains just out of reach.”
She glanced once across the room.
“In that sense, it’s emblematic of the moment it comes out of. It doesn’t force clarity where there isn’t any. It allows what remains out of reach to remain out of reach.
"It's a beautifully written book about perception at its limits, about what resists being seen."
The words sounded right. She heard them land, clean, complete. And yet, they felt thin in her own ears.
She kept going.
“And this novel isn’t alone,” she said. “We’ve spent the term circling a number of contemporary books that do something similar."
Her eyes moved across the room, steady again.
“It’s not a lack of ambition or skill," she says. “It’s a shift in what the novel can do. Earlier works could close around a set of conditions—give them form. Now—” she hesitates. “Now everything feels provisional, fragmented. There’s nothing stable to close around. So these novels remain enclosed within themselves."
She watched them write that down. That landed.
Arlen wrote nothing. He kept watching her, waiting.
She kept going. “These books don’t stand outside power in order to confront it directly. They work within it. They register its effects in the smallest units. Perception, attention, what can and cannot be said.
“And I would argue that’s why they matter now. It may be the only way the novel can still listen to itself without forcing a clarity that isn’t actually there.”
No one moved.
She could feel it, the space between what she had said and what they were taking in. A few of them were still watching her, trying to follow the line of it, to make it hold. Others had gone still in a different way, not writing, not nodding, not pushing back.
Arlen hadn’t looked away. His pen lay untouched on the desk. There was nothing tentative in his expression now.
She kept her gaze on him, then looked back across the room, as if to widen the terrain she had just covered.
It didn’t widen.
Arlen straightened in his seat. He looked around once, checking the room, then back at her.
“Arlen,” she said. “Did you have a question?”
He hesitated.
“I don’t know,” he said. “I’m trying to follow what you’re saying.”
A few heads turned toward him.
“You’re saying the Hesse book”—he glanced at the board—“answered its moment. And this one”—he nodded toward Shadows—“answers ours.”
She nodded once. “In a sense, yes.”
He didn’t nod back.
“I don’t see how it does,” he said. “I don’t see what it’s actually answering.”
She turned to meet the other students' eyes. They weren't giving anything away.
“What do you mean?” she said.
“You said Hesse is writing with fascism taking over,” he said. “That the book is responding to that. Fine.”
He leaned forward slightly.
“What about now?”
She held his gaze. “What about now?”
“Is fascism any less of a problem now than it was then?”
“That’s not quite the question,” she said. “The conditions aren’t identical. The forms power takes—how it organizes itself, how it’s experienced—those have changed.”
She heard herself and kept going.
“What a novel can do in relation to that also changes. It’s not always a matter of direct confrontation.”
She looked at him.
His face hadn’t changed. Blank. Just not following her where she wanted him to go.
Arlen didn’t speak often. He was from a small town in eastern Washington. When he did speak, it was usually to ask something no one else had bothered to ask. He didn’t write things down the way the others did. He listened, then said what seemed obvious to him.
A voice from the other side of the room. Maya.
“I think what she’s saying is that it’s more honest this way,” Maya said. “Like, those older books impose meaning. This one doesn’t pretend to.”
She added, “And the writing is so beautiful, that’s meaning in and of itself.”
A few heads nodded.
Isabel inclined her head slightly. “I think Maya is getting at something important,” she said. “It isn’t just a matter of preference. It’s a difference in function.”
She sat back on the desk.
“The novel doesn’t occupy the same position it once did. The conditions are different. The scale is different. What could be confronted directly in earlier work doesn’t present itself in the same way now.”
Her eyes moved briefly toward the board, then back.
“So the work changes. It becomes more attentive to how power is lived rather than declared. That's a recognition of its limits.”
Arlen didn’t look away.
“So you’re saying it stays in its lane,” he said. “That it works at the level of perception, small adjustments, whatever fits inside that frame.”
He leaned forward.
“But if someone writes a novel that doesn’t do that—if it doesn’t narrow itself, if it doesn’t turn away—looks straight at it and doesn’t reduce it—”
He let the sentence tighten.
“If someone writes that book now, and the protagonist says I’m going outside, into the world, just like Knecht did, you’re saying it doesn’t belong? That it’s doing something wrong?”
The room went quiet.
He didn’t raise his voice.
“Like if the next Dostoevsky shows up and writes something that doesn’t stay small, doesn’t stay careful, something that goes straight at it, you’re saying that’s out of step? That it shouldn’t exist in this moment?”
She turned back to the board, as if something there might help her find the line again. Her hand brushed at her thigh. She reached for her coffee, lifted it, set it back down without drinking.
When she spoke, she didn’t look at him.
“I think what Arlen is asking,” she said, her voice steady again, “is whether a novel that refuses that kind of restraint, one that tries to confront things more directly, still has a place now.
“It’s a fair question. But the conditions that produced those earlier works aren’t ours. What could be said, how it could be said, what a reader could receive, those things shift.”
Her hand rested lightly against the desk.
“A novel like the one you’re describing would require a set of conditions that we don’t have access to at the moment.
“It’s not that such a book shouldn’t exist.”
Now she looked up, taking in the room as a whole.
“It’s that it can’t exist. Not now."
Arlen didn’t nod.
“Why not?” he said.
No one spoke.
“You’re saying it can’t exist now,” he went on.
He glanced once at the board, then back at her.
“A minute ago you said Hesse is writing with fascism taking over, and that Castalia is a closed system pretending it can stay above it. And Knecht looks at that and says, I’m out. He goes back into the world.”
He held her there.
“So what’s different now?” he said. “In some ways, it’s worse. And you’re saying the novel has to narrow itself, stay small, not force anything.”
He stopped to gather his thoughts.
“It sounds like you’re asking it to do exactly what Hesse was writing against.”
No one was writing now.
“To stay inside the system. To keep everything contained. To build our own Castalia and never leave."
His voice was steady.
“Why should we be any different from him? Is it that we can’t do it? That we don't know how to do it?"
He shook his head.
“Or that we won’t. And if we won't, then why not?"
She didn’t answer. She had no answer.
She turned it back on him.
“Why do you think that is, Arlen?” she said.
He kept his eyes on her.
“I don’t know,” he said. “But it feels like something’s off.”
A few people turned around to register him, then looked at Isabel.
Then he said, “Like our novels, have been… trained to obey some invisible rules. Kept inside certain lines.”
He let the words sit, then finished it without raising his voice.
“Like they've been whipped into submission. And nobody’s doing anything about it.”
He didn’t look away.
“So what are we afraid of?”
Isabel held his gaze. It wasn’t the language. It was the certainty in it. The way he had said it without reaching for her terms, without trying to meet her where she was.
She felt the shape of an answer, but it felt too exposed, and let it pass.
She set the mug down carefully.
“That’s one way of putting it,” she said.
Her voice was even again.
“I don’t think it’s a about fear, is it?”
She let her eyes move across the room, pulling them back into it.
“I think it’s a matter of form. Of what a novel can sustain without collapsing into something else. It’s not that nobody’s doing anything,” she said. “It’s that the novel isn’t the place to do it. Not now. Not in this form.”
Her voice steadied as she went on.
“It did that once. It had that role. It doesn’t occupy that position anymore. And there are reasons for that.”
Her eyes moved across the room.
“Could that change? Possibly. I don’t know. But I’m not going to stand here and tell you what the novel should be. My job is to describe what it is. What it's become."
"Then what is it?" Arlen asked.
Isabel waited for the words to come. She looked back at the board, then out at them.
“I think, at one point, you could say the novel was a mirror with a message. It reflected the world, but it also tried to shape it. It made claims about what that world meant.
“I don’t think it operates that way anymore.”
Her voice stayed even.
“Now, it reflects, but it doesn’t presume to resolve. It stays with what’s there.
“The novel isn’t a mirror with a message. It’s just a mirror. What it means isn’t up to the author anymore. It’s up to us.”
Arlen didn’t look away.
“You mean like reading the news?”
Isabel smiled.
“In a sense,” she said. “The news of one’s inner life.”
He held her there.
“Like a journal?” he said. “A diary?”
“A diary with a structure,” she said. “With a story.”
He frowned slightly.
“Like a memoir?”
The room went silent.
“Something like that,” she said. “A fictionalized memoir.”
The words were out before she could stop them.
She kept her face steady.
No one wrote it down.
Arlen just looked at her.
He wanted something else.
Something true.
In that moment, she had nothing to give him.
Isabel stepped into the hallway still carrying the echo of the room, the way the students had looked at her, waiting. She began to settle. By the time she reached the corner, the tightening in her gut had eased.
“Isabel.”
She turned. It was Marianne Adler, her department chair, a folder tucked under her arm, moving at that brisk, practiced pace that never quite broke into a hurry.
“How did it go?” she asked.
“Good,” Isabel said, easy, without thinking. “They were engaged.”
“I heard you have a lively one this term. Ready for your trip?"
Isabel smiled. “You have no idea."
Adler nodded, satisfied. They fell into step for a few paces.
“What were you working on today?”
“The relevance of the modern novel,” Isabel said. “Or trying to.”
Adler nodded. “Sounds necessary."
They kept walking.
Then Adler stopped and turned to Isabel. "Have you come across The Bootmaker’s Daughter?”
“I’ve heard about it."
“She was one of ours. A few years back. It’s very assured. The novel follows a girl—her father makes boots, a small shop. Germany in the 1930s. The same men come in, always in some kind of uniform. The book never names anything beyond the shape of their bodies, their feet, what they ask for. It stays with the shop—the measurements, the leather, the finish of each pair. I’m not sure the daughter even steps outside.
"A marvelously tight, contained narrative."
Isabel nodded. “Is that the one they’re comparing to Proust?”
“Yes. Some critics are.”
"That’s interesting.”
Adler glanced at her. “You’ve spent more time with Proust than most of us. What do you hear in it?”
Isabel felt the answer come before she had time to say it.
"Proust has that reputation, but he never stays small,” she said. “You get something like the madeleine—just a taste—and then suddenly everything is there. Rooms, people, time folding back on itself. It keeps opening, whether you want it to or not."
She heard it as she said it. Something in the phrasing was off. She went on. “This sounds… more contained."
Adler adjusted the folder in her arm.
“In a good way, I think,” she said. "I imagine Proust might admire that."
Isabel hesitated.
“That kind of control is impressive, hard to sustain," she said.
They reached the end of the hall. A student passed between them, offering a quick greeting.
“It’s why The Shape of Shadows landed the way it did,” Isabel added. “It never steps outside itself. That voice is arresting."
Adler smiled. “Exactly.”
Adler glanced at her watch.
“I’ll send you next term's syllabus draft when I have it," Isabel said.
“Please do. And enjoy Montevideo."
She moved off, already turning toward her next appointment.
Isabel stood there a second longer, then continued down the hall, her stride steady. Montevideo. She looked forward to some rest, a little thinking, revising a paper. She'd find a used bookshop, old books, and good coffee. A few days away, among people who spoke her language. She would gather her sea legs. Rebalance. Listen, think, return to campus properly.
She could already feel it the restoration. She’d revise next term's syllabus. Add The Bootmaker’s Daughter. That made sense. Adler would like that.